Expert In Trial Says Minnesota Officer Should Not Have Used Deadly Force

Expert In Trial Says Minnesota Officer Should Not Have Used Deadly Force

Photo:  Philando Castile

A use of force expert testified Wednesday that St. Anthony (MN) police Officer Jeronimo Yanez should not have used deadly force against Philando Castile during a traffic stop in Falcon Heights last July.

Jeffrey Noble, whose expert witness consulting firm website says he’s worked in law enforcement for 28 years, testified for the prosecution that Yanez’s “use of deadly force was unreasonable, excessive and inappropriate.”

Noble spent about an hour-and-a-half on the stand Wednesday.

ABC 6 reports that the expert raised concerns the that Yanez never mentioned to his partner that Castile had a gun, either in the moment after learning about the gun, or after the shooting.

“If told you have a threat, let the partner know right away,” Noble said. “It allows the officer to get in a safer position, just in case.”

There have been no other reported details on why this expert says that deadly force should not have been used and the fact that an officer did not notify another officer about the gun has nothing to do with whether the use of force was justified or not.

We will continue to follow this case.

 

About The Author

mm

Law Officer is the only major law enforcement publication and website owned and operated by law enforcement. This unique facet makes Law Officer much more than just a publishing company but is a true advocate for the profession.

3 Comments

  1. Ltpar

    The trouble with most of these so called “experts” is they got their experience sitting behind a desk. Additionally, they testify for whichever side is paying them and truth is not the object. If this is the same Jeff Noble, I worked with, he was nothing but a second rate field officer and law school messed up his head even more. He was better at Internal Affairs and screwing Officers who had falen out of favor with our corrupt management bunch.

  2. LegalBeagle

    He has a history of dishonesty in his “expert” witness practice.

  3. Dvillan

    Sounds like someone is paving the way for more consultant dollars. Especially spreading himself to the anti-police side….. more money I would imagine for Plaintiff’s attorney. http://www.policeconduct.net

Share This